Tutorial · 9 min read
Containers on Regulated HPC Clusters
Containers are the fastest way to share environments across labs, but compliance officers still expect airtight controls. Follow this workflow to ship GPU-ready images that pass security reviews on ORNL, Argonne, and pharma clusters.
Toolchain snapshot
- Apptainer 1.3/1.4 for SIF signing and overlay support.
- NVIDIA Container Toolkit 1.16 for GH200/H100 MIG awareness.
- ROCm Container Toolkit 6.x for MI300A/X support.
- Cosign 2.x for Sigstore-based signing.
Build + sign workflow
apptainer build --fakeroot climate.sif climate.def
cosign sign --key k8s://hcp/signing climate.sif
cosign verify --key hcp/signing.pub climate.sif
Keep definition files in git for diffable review and store signing keys in an HSM-backed vault.
Granting GPU + network access
apptainer run --nv \
--bind /lus:/lus,/scratch:/scratch \
climate.sif python run.py
Use --nv or --rocm runtime flags, bind only required directories, and rely on Slurm job_container or burst-buffer stages for inputs/outputs.
Policy enforcement
- Maintain allow-list registries/digests via
/etc/containers/policy.json. - Scan images with Trivy/Grype before promotion.
- Monitor runtime with Falco/eBPF for unexpected syscalls.
Troubleshooting
- Permission denied? Avoid needing
cap_sys_admin; rewrite definitions to minimize mounts. - Slow performance? Check for double encryption and extra bind mounts.
- Missing GPUs? Ensure host driver versions match container CUDA/ROCm versions.
Compliance talking points
- Signed images + attested pipelines prove provenance.
- Containers inherit the host kernel—document patch cadence.
- Archive SBOMs and vulnerability reports with each release.
References
- Apptainer 1.4 security hardening guide (Sept 2024).
- NVIDIA GH200 container best practices (SC24).
- EuroHPC JU policy templates for containerized workloads.